Click to enter complete search
Will autonomous vehicles change our cities?
Sebastien Miller
14th May 2018

Sebastien Miller, Urban Designer at Broadway Malyan, cautions against assuming traffic problems will be solved.

The development of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) promise to change our commuting patterns in the not too distant future. Reduced traffic volumes and congestion will allow us to do away with excess travel lanes and mass parking facilities. Given that such vehicle infrastructure takes up anywhere from 30 - 50% of urban land, this could be a blessing for cities as the amount of re-developable land increases.

For designers and city planners, it offers a potential urban renaissance, where we can make good all the missed opportunities of ill-conceived transport decisions. It could allow us to provide higher densities, more affordable inner city housing options, develop networks of linear parks for sports, recreation and commuting, as well as exploring urban farming in cities previously built on prime agricultural soils. If managed right, this may offer a new model of city living.

Are We Over Estimating the Benefits?

Some professionals cite an 80 - 90% reduction in traffic as we transition to AVs. However, the number of autonomous vehicles required within a city is not dictated by overall daily usage, but by peak usage. This is the most important point in understanding potential impacts AVs will have on commuting patterns and city forms. Taking Dubai as an example, the diagram below shows why most projections are overconfident when estimating the potential traffic reductions associated with Autonomous Vehicles.

Autonomous vehicles naively promise that congestion will be a thing of the past and commuting times radically slashed. Certainly, congestion will be reduced with more efficient, computer controlled driving techniques and route selection, but it will never be eliminated. Especially when most cities have radial transport networks that focus congestion on central employment districts. Electric AVs require parking spaces to re-charge after the peak hour rush, especially in city-regions or metropolitan areas that have commuting times of 2 hours plus. Convenience dictates that these be located in or near to the CBD, which means downtown areas will continue to require on-street and dedicated parking structures.

Autonomous vehicles will free up urban space to key streets, districts or plazas, but not city wide and unfortunately, not in the quantities we expect. Only a major uptake in public transportation or more flexible working hours could offset the need for vast fleets of AV’s to satisfy our peak hour commuting demands. We are being sold an autonomous vision that is in equal parts intimately personal and seamlessly efficient.

However, this private model of transportation will do nothing to alleviate peak hour traffic congestion or parking. A million commuters in private cars (automated or not) is still a million vehicles on our roads.

Evolution or Revolution?

Shared autonomous vehicles are unlikely to offer a like-for-like replacement with the private transportation models. Private autonomous vehicles will offer significantly higher levels of comfort, privacy, personal security, and flexibility with their use, a privilege that many people will happily pay for.

The argument of a direct substitution with private automobiles is unrealistic in our complex and fluid world. More likely is that shared AVs will offer a new layer of urban transit, the same way we have taxi, bus, bicycle and metro to choose from. It will give us more options and play a role in making our cities more efficient and democratic, especially to those who are mobility impaired due to age (young or old).

Autonomous Vehicles could be too Successful…

Paradoxically, autonomous vehicles could deliver more traffic on the road as we see reduced costs and increased independence. As I type this article, (working from home), I’m thinking of things I have to do today. A business meeting in town; collect the kids from school at 3:00; pick up my wife from work at 4:30. We are a one-car family that tries to save on costs and minimize our carbon footprint, so I have to bundle these tasks into a single loop-trip.

The downside is the inefficient use of my time, as this will take the better part of 2+ hours. If the family had the benefit of a cheap and efficient autonomous vehicle system, we would almost certainly make 3x individual trips, increasing both congestion and distances traveled.

From One Problem to Another…

AVs could be just as polluting as petrol-based cars. Electric cars are only environmentally friendly if the recharge points are linked to carbon-free energy. Otherwise, we are literally driving coal or gas powered vehicles. Fortunately, opportunities for meaningful carbon reduction exists as renewable energy sources increases in both in use and efficiency. One issue that is rarely considered however is the decommissioning and recycling of batteries.

Chemical point-source pollution is likely to be the next major environmental concern as we develop fleets of millions of electric vehicles this century. Compared to the effects of carbon and global warming, it is the lesser of two evils, but government and industry need to think about how this will be managed before we trade one environmental disaster for another.

The Future is Near…

The rapid pace in which automotive and communications technology is proceeding means that AVs will be commercially available within the next 10-15 years. Autonomous technology requires 5G systems, which is only expected to be launched in 2020 at the earliest. 5G networks allow autonomous vehicles to communicate with each other while in motion, as well as navigating among regular and unpredictable human drivers.

“Dubai (UAE) recently launched a strategy that aims for 25% of all trips to be autonomous by 2030 and to ‘turn itself to the world largest R&D lab for driverless transportation’”

All the major car manufacturers and tech companies are getting involved, including Tesla, Uber, Ford, Toyota, and Google. In 2015, self-driving trucks started live testing on freeways in Nevada where they safely navigate public autoroutes, though still with a human driver to monitor all systems. City officials and governments are already preparing for the change in commuting patterns, with forward thinking city regions introducing pioneering AV policies. Dubai (UAE) recently launched a strategy that aims for 25% of all trips to be autonomous by 2030 and to ‘turn itself to the world largest R&D lab for driverless transportation’.

This 25% figure also includes the existing automated Dubai Metro system, which one could argue doesn't really count as an independently autonomous vehicle. Nor does it specify what percentage of those trips will be shared. Regardless of this detail, the Emirate has introduced an autonomous test vehicle as part of its commitment to a self-driving future. Such a vision goes beyond city efficiency, as Dubai will capitalize on economic revenues associated with research and technological development, positioning itself one of the leading knowledge-based cities in the world.

Conclusion

For autonomous transportation to deliver a meaningful reduction in vehicle numbers in our cities, we need to rethink the models of car ‘ownership’. Cities require a vision where shared-use models (rather than private models) of autonomous transportation are promoted.

Policy development must not naively view autonomous vehicles as a like-for like swap with the private automobile. Such a goal requires governments, city planners, the auto-industry and 3rd party operators come together with a common approach and vision. It would be the missed opportunity of the century if we don't get this right.

This article was originally published on Urban Design Journal, Issue 146, Spring 2018.
Image references: Image 1 source: Charles Montgomery, 2013, Happy City; Image 2 source: Volvo.